• About Me
  • Projects
  • Resume
  • Contact
  • More
    • About Me
    • Projects
    • Resume
    • Contact
  • About Me
  • Projects
  • Resume
  • Contact

LUCAS HABER

LUCAS HABERLUCAS HABERLUCAS HABER

Instron Grip Re-design

During my first co-op where I worked as a sustaining engineer at Instron, one of the biggest projects I worked on was the re-design of the inner mechanics of their 10kN pneumatic grip.

Skip to Professional Drawings

Problem Statement

I was tasked with improving the strength, power efficiency, and measurement accuracy, of the grips as well as reducing the potential for user error.

Objectives

  • Examine how the product has failed in the field and hypothesize reasons for the failure (is there user error or a design flaw or both?)
  • Analyze existing design to see where there may be inefficiencies
  • Observe what is happening with the grip during testing that may be impacting results
  • Brainstorm and sketch out designs to improve flaws
  • 3D model and print best design ideas
  • Test prototypes and improve models (repeat as much as necessary)
  • Create drawings for finalized design
  • Order new parts and test, make changes if necessary

Action

  • Look at where parts have broken in the field and analyze using FEA
  • Create an assembly of the grip to simulate the movement of parts and see where energy may be lost to friction
  • Analyze how data error can be reduced with pre-loading samples
  • Re-model components from scratch taking into account the knowledge and intent from prior analysis
  • Insert prototypes into SOLIDWORKS assembly, making necessary changes
  • Print prototypes and install them into a grip to ensure functionality
  • Finalize design, creating drawings for machining and order parts
  • Test prototypes against originals and compare

Challenges

  • It was difficult to re-design the parts to improve the geometry while still fitting withing the existing frame
    • It was decided that the frame would need to be changed, as there were existing issues with the frame already
  • Thoroughly testing the 3D printed prototypes was impossible because they would break under actual test conditions
    • Machined metal parts had to be ordered to perform rigorous testing
  • Getting funds for real machined parts was difficult
    • It had to be proved that the design changes would produce significant beneficial results for the customer
  • It took a long time for the prototypes to be manufactured
    • The parts had to be tested after my co-op was over

Results

  • The FEA of the prototypes showed that they were significantly stronger than the previous design and that they would hold up over long term testing under forces more than 20% greater than the max force that the grips could apply
  • The 'slipping' in the inner mechanism was almost entirely reduced, greatly decreasing the internal friction and 'jolting' motion between parts
  • By reducing 'jolting' and improving the effectiveness of the pre-loading geometry, measurement accuracy was improved
  • As of right now, testing has shown great improvements in testing results under most grip positions but only some improvement in other positions. Further testing and analysis is required

Videos of Existing and New Grip Design

Existing Grip Design

In this video is the existing grip design. The white line on the multiplier link of the grip is used as a reference point to see how much the components are sliding against each other.

New Grip Design

In this video is the 3D printed prototype of the grip design. It is clear that, when compared with the existing design, there is significantly less sliding between grip components which means there is less friction.

Major Grip Changes in Depth

Changes from Existing (left side) to New (right side) Grip Components

1. Pin and Roller

  • Increased the diameter of the pin, decreasing the inner diameter of the roller, because there had been pin failures in the field

2. Slider Link

  • Increased the length of the slider to improve the geometry with the multiplier link and decrease sliding between the two
  • Decreased the length of the support 'wings' on either side of the multiplier link (4) and increased the thickness and radius on the fillet because they had snapped off in the field

3. Multiplier Link

  • Re-modeled the geometry so that the slider link would apply force directly perpendicular to the surface of the link
  • Increased thickness and improved geometry of the link to better disperse internal forces and maximize load capacity

4. Advancer Thumbscrew

  • Bored a hole through the thumbscrew and put a counterbore in the knob to allow for a cheaper, easier, and more secure method of attaching the advancer foot (5)  
  • Increased the outer diameter of the thumbscrew to help make up for the lost material in the center

5. Advancer Foot

  • Re-designed the advancer foot to be installed using a nut instead of set screws
  • Added a feature to stop the advancer foot from pulling out of the jaw holder (6) while still being able to freely slide and rotate
  • Modified the angle of the advancer foot's face so that it would roll and not slide against the jaw holder (6), decreasing friction

6. Jaw Holder

  • Modified the angle of the jaw holder where it meets the advancer foot (5) to improve testing accuracy when pre-loaded
  • Re-modeled the spring slot to stop the spring from jamming
  • Increased the length of the jaw holder to function with the rest of the geometry

Finalized Prototype Drawings (Components 1-6)

Roller (component 1)

Slider Link (component 2)

Multiplier Link (component 3)

Advancer Thumbscrew  (component 4)

Advancer Foot (component 5)

Jaw Holder (component 6)


Copyright © 2025 Lucas Haber - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by